Stage 1: Information review and context setting
IAP2 level: Inform and consult
Provide clear, balanced, and timely information and gather feedback ideas, options, or decisions.
Feedback closed on 27 October. We asked you to share your vision for Cambridge and transport solutions for the future.
Cambridge Connections is the transport plan Waipā District Council is developing to guide our town's transport network over the coming 30 years.
Cambridge and the Waipā District is experiencing unprecedented growth. For many local residents, the population of Cambridge will more than double in their lifetime: projections show that by 2055, it will have grown to 33,000.
Transport infrastructure is vital to planning for growth – it affects all the ways people and goods move around the region, including roads, footpaths, cycleways, public transport, parking, freight, and the connections between them.
If we don’t plan well, we risk congested roads and a town that is difficult to get around. But with careful planning we can choose what forms of transport we use, ensure public spaces are centred around people, and prioritise climate resilience.
here are two key reasons why we need to a develop a transport plan that will serve our community now and into the future.
As Cambridge residents, we already know this is a great place to live. Our town is full of character and green spaces, with thriving businesses and a vibrant town centre. It’s liveable and easy to get out and about.
Central Government has designated Waipā as a Tier One growth district – this means we’re required to plan for 30 years’ of housing and infrastructure. In other words, we need to grow! It’s important to plan carefully so Cambridge and Waipā continue to be a great place to live for future generations.
We need to plan for effective transport into the future, but crucially, we also need to be able to fund it. That is why we need to make a business case to New Zealand Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi).
In line with its 30-year plan, NZTA allocates funding on a three-year cycle:
Cambridge Connections will enable us to seek funding from NZTA, based on the recommendations the Council develops over the next 16 months – including:
When we asked the community for feedback about the future of transport in Cambridge, 58 percent of respondents said they want a 'third bridge', the most common theme to emerge.
Investigating bridge options will be an important aspect in planning for transport infrastructure over the next 30 years.
Cambridge Connections: Identifying a bridge corridor
At the end of next year, Cambridge Connections will have identified a bridge corridor, the general area where a new bridge and connecting roads could be built in the future. It will still be another two to three years before the specific site can be confirmed, due to the large amount of technical work required to meet legislative requirements. The potential bridge is a long-term project that will span decades. The steps ahead include:
Beyond Cambridge Connections:

We need to know what the transport problems are, in order to create the best solutions.
Defining the core transport problems Cambridge is facing is the first step in building a business case for NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi.
Decisions about these draft problem statements will be made by Elected Members on Wednesday, December 3.
Below are the draft problem statements, showing how each has been informed by community feedback:
1. High growth and impacts on transport network: Rapid population and economic growth and development in and around Cambridge, coupled with high reliance on private vehicles and limited transport choices, is placing increasing pressure on the town’s transport network and wider network connections. This is increasing congestion and delays, posing safety risks, increasing emissions and negatively impacting on accessibility for the community.
| Growth and congestion: | Rapid population growth, new growth areas, increasing traffic, congestion on main roads and key intersections, parking pressures in the town centre, preserving Cambridge’s character and liveability, |
| Accessible and equitable transport options: | Limited public transport (including affordability and frequency) – buses (& accessible bus stops), shuttles, trams, park and ride options, regional routes, missing safety footpath and cycle connections, school travel infrastructure, improved design/equitable access and mobility for people with disabilities, youth and aging populations (scooters, wheelchairs and the elderly) to healthcare, recreation and marae, education (including kohanga reo), safe footpaths and crossings, sustainable, low-emission, climate-resilient transport. |
| Preserving town character, and planning for growth: | Deep concern about preserving Cambridge’s village feel’ and ‘charm’ as it grows. Calls for stronger long-term vision, master planning and infrastructure alignment |
2. Through and across town traffic and freight vehicles accessing through residential areas and the town centre: Through and across town traffic and freight vehicles are accessing residential streets and Cambridge’s town centre, increasing the crash risk for road users, increasing congestion and diminishing the town’s amenity and character.
| Ease freight pressure, manage congestion and preserve town character: | Freight and heavy vehicles cutting through residential areas, town centre areas; need for a ring road/freight corridors/bypass and access to the expressway; town-centre congestion; noise and road damage; environmental and cultural values, call to keep trucks out of CBD; balance freight needs with town character, intersection designs that balance efficiency with safety, signalisation. |
3. Limitations and resilience of river crossings: The aging and limited capacity of bridge infrastructure, exacerbated by the lack of schools and essential services on the Leamington side of town is constraining reliable and resilient transport links between Cambridge and Leamington and the wider network.
These limitations reduce network resilience, disrupt connectivity during emergencies and temporary closures, and compromise the safety and efficiency of the transport system.
| A third bridge, growth and congestion: | Ageing Victoria Bridge, planning for climate resilience, safety and emergency access, future proofing, easing congestion, alternative route connections, better expressway access, designation of a future corridor, narrow footpaths and lack of dedicated cycleways across bridges. |
| Cross-river resilience | Leamington lacking schools, retail, and services; need for self-sufficient local centre, poor transport links to schools and town, need for new bridge and local facilities to ease cross-river pressure. |
We are aiming for:

We're committed to making engagement meaningful, not just a tick box. That's why we’ve adopted the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) framework to guide our approach from this point forward. Note, the organisation is called the Engagement Institute.
This next phase is a fresh start for Cambridge Connections. There are no predetermined outcomes, no fixed decisions on transport routes or solutions – and we are inviting our community to help us shape the direction of the project.
Throughout this project, we will engage at different levels depending on the stage and topic. Here's how the IAP2 spectrum will guide our approach:
| Level | Goal | Our promise to you |
| Inform | Provide clear, balanced, and timely information | We will keep you informed |
| Consult | Gather feedback on ideas, options, or decisions | We will listen, consider your views, and report back on how your input influenced the outcome |
| Involve | Work with you throughout the process | We will reflect your input in the project and show how it shaped decisions |
| Collaborate | Partner with you to develop alternatives and identify preferred solutions | We will incorporate your input into decisions to the maximum extent possible |
The engagement level ‘empower’ and will not be part of this project as Council is the statutory decision maker. We are committed to transparency and genuine community influence throughout.
IAP2 level: Inform and consult
Provide clear, balanced, and timely information and gather feedback ideas, options, or decisions.
IAP2 level: Inform and consult
Provide clear, balanced, and timely information and gather feedback ideas, options, or decisions.
IAP2 level: Inform and involve
Provide clear, balanced, and timely information and work with you throughout the process.
'Short list' and recommended programme of transport activities
IAP2 level: Inform and involve
Provide clear, balanced, and timely information and work with you throughout the process.
IAP2 level: Inform and involve
Provide clear, balanced, and timely information and work with you throughout the process.
IAP2 level: Inform
Provide clear, balanced, and timely information.
Sign up to the Cambridge Connections newsletter to be the first to hear when these opportunities open.
The framework is recognised globally as the gold standard for public participation. It ensures people are involved in decisions that affect them and helps build trust and transparency through:
We follow the IAP2 Core Values because they help ensure good decisions that reflect the community’s diverse perspectives. These values include:
The project began in 2022 following the adoption of the Waipā Transport Strategy. The strategy looks at how an integrated, safe and sustainable transport network can be built across the Waipā District over the next 30 years, taking into account existing infrastructure, the changing needs of its growing population, and climate change.
Planning for growth in Cambridge was seen as a priority, with a focus on all components of the current network, including the river crossings, and ways to encourage and enable more use of public transport.
In 2022, a Project Steering Group was tasked to look at the complex transport issues and options for Cambridge. The group included Councillors and Cambridge Community Board members, iwi partners, and representatives from NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi, the heavy freight industry, and regional transport planning experts. Detailed traffic modelling was undertaken, and extensive stakeholder information sessions were held over 2022-23.
Community feedback from the Ahu Ake – Waipā Community Spatial Plan consultations and stakeholder input helped inform the Council to develop a range of options, which were presented in 2024. These included a potential third bridge and enhanced walking and cycling routes, and were a step towards preparing a business case to submit to the NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi to seek funding.
When a potential location for a bridge crossing was made public in March 2024, there was huge community angst. Following an emotional public meeting, Mayor Susan O'Regan took any future bridge location off the table, commissioned a review of the project, and requested the project be reset with a much stronger focus on engaging the community.
In November 2024, Chief Executive Steph O’Sullivan announced the next step would be to appoint a programme lead whose first priority would be community engagement.
On April 11, 2025, Katie Mayes was announced as Executive Director for the programme. A Cambridge resident and strong strategic leader, Mayes' previous role was as National Manager System Planning and Investment for NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi. She began with Waipā District Council on Monday, May 5.
From March to May 2024, we sought feedback from the community on the Cambridge Connections project. Over that period, we received more than 500 individual pieces of feedback.
It became clear through this process that more time and deeper engagement were needed to reflect the full range of community views. In August 2024, the Council made the decision to reset the project, placing community involvement at the centre of the process moving forward.
Timeline item 1 - complete
Cambridge Connections - Moving forward together workshop
Thursday, June 26, 2025
Timeline item 3 - complete
Recruitment of programme director
December 2024-March 2025
Timeline item 4 - complete
Project reset
November 2024: Council reconfirmed a total reset for the project.
Timeline item 5 - complete
Project on pause
August 2024: More time needed to consider the next steps for the project.
Timeline item 6 - complete
Elected members decision
August 2024: Elected members consider community feedback and key themes.
Timeline item 7 - complete
Independent process review
April 2024: An independent review into the development of the Cambridge Connections business case was undertaken.
Timeline item 8 - complete
Engagement seeking stakeholder and community feedback
March-May 2024: Stakeholder and community feedback on the transport options.
Timeline item 9 - complete
Decision to remove a bridge location from engagement
April 2024: Bridge location removed from engagement and the project business case.
Timeline item 10 - complete
Detailed traffic modelling undertaken and strategic case first draft approved.
2023
Timeline item 11 - complete
Initial engagement and steering group appointed
2022
Timeline item 12 - complete
Elected members allocated project budget from 2021/31 Long Term Plan
2021
A bridge corridor is the general area where a new bridge and connecting roads could be built in the future. It’s not a final design or exact location. It’s a broad zone that helps planners focus their investigations and community conversations.
The bridge corridor helps identify where a crossing could work best, while balancing transport needs, growth, environmental effects, and what’s important to the community.
The corridor would be refined through further technical work, engagement, and feedback through future stages
The transport system is everything that helps people and goods move around Cambridge and beyond.
It includes roads, footpaths, cycleways, public transport, parking, and the connections between them
Creating 'problem statements' is the first stage in building a business case to NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi. This means defining the core transport problems Cambridge is facing.
NZTA says that “strategic cases need to include a clear and concise description of the problems that the investment will address, and the benefits that can be expected ... It is essential to understand the underlying, or root, causes and consequences of problems, and describe them clearly and concisely using plain language."
These are normally high-level problem statements. The goal is to have a clear understanding of the core issues.
Please note that the ‘solutions’ come after this first stage. We need to define the problems, so we can identify the best solutions.